Field Notes
Practical notes on systems, governance, and implementation reality.
Short essays, implementation patterns, and working observations from the space between application architecture, cybersecurity governance, and organizational execution.
-
Designing Requirements That Can Survive Change
Requirements should not resist change. They should make future business decisions easier to evaluate, implement, and trace.
-
Requirements Are Contracts Between Business and Technology
Requirements are more than specifications—they are agreements between business and technology that define expectations, accountability, and success.
-
If You Can’t Test It, It Isn’t a Requirement
A requirement that cannot be measured, tested, or verified is not ready for development. Good requirements define their own proof of success.
-
Every Requirement Needs an Owner
Requirements are not validated because they are documented. They are validated when someone with business authority owns the decision.
-
Business Rules Are Architecture
Business rules define how an organization operates. Architecture exists to implement those rules—not invent them.
-
Developers Don’t Build Bad Software—Bad Requirements Do
Developers often receive the blame for failed software, but many project failures begin with unclear, incomplete, or unvalidated requirements.
-
When Stakeholders Don’t Agree, Requirements Don’t Exist
Requirements cannot exist without shared understanding. Stakeholder alignment is the foundation of successful software projects and sound business decisions.
-
Functional Requirements Don’t Define Success
Functional requirements describe what software does, but they do not define whether the system succeeds. Business outcomes require measurable quality requirements.
